首页> 外文OA文献 >Long-Term Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Autografts.
【2h】

Long-Term Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Autografts.

机译:前交叉韧带重建的长期结果:髌骨肌腱与H绳肌自体移植的系统评价。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Much controversy still exists surrounding graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Over the past decade, an increase in comparative studies with longer follow-up has enhanced our understanding of current graft options and outcomes.PURPOSE: To describe the long-term comparative outcomes of ACL reconstruction with autograft bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) versus autograft hamstring (HS) ACL reconstruction with regard to clinical and radiographic outcomes.STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.METHODS: A search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed to identify studies in the English language with outcome data comparing ACL reconstruction utilizing autograft BPTB and autograft HS; only studies with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included. Outcome data included failure and complications, manual and instrumented laxity, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic risk of osteoarthritis.RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 953 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 8 were level 1 evidence and 2 were level 2. Mean follow-up was 8.96 years (range, 5-15.3 years). No differences in graft failure or manual or instrumented laxity were seen in any studies. Lower clinical outcomes scores and greater motion loss were seen in BPTB patients in 1 and 2 studies, respectively. Two of 4 studies reporting on anterior knee pain, and 3 of 7 that recorded kneeling pain found it more frequently among BPTB patients. One study found significantly increased reoperation rates in HS patients, while another found a similar result in BPTB, and 1 study reported a significant increase in contralateral ACL tears in BPTB patients. Three of 5 studies reporting on radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis noted significantly increased rates in BPTB patients.CONCLUSION: This systematic review comparing long-term outcomes after ACL reconstruction with either autograft BPTB or autograft HS suggests no significant differences in manual/instrumented laxity and graft failures between graft types. An increase in long-term anterior knee pain, kneeling pain, and higher rates of osteoarthritis were noted with BPTB graft use.
机译:背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中围绕移植物选择的争议仍然很多。在过去的十年中,随着比较研究的增加和随访时间的延长,我们对当前的移植物选择和结果有了更深入的了解。目的:描述自体骨-骨腱-骨(BPTB)重建ACL的长期比较结果相对于自体绳肌(HS)ACL重建的临床和放射学结果。研究设计:系统评价;证据水平:2.方法:检索PubMed,MEDLINE,Cochrane和Scopus数据库,以英语进行研究,并比较结果数据,比较采用自体BPTB和自体HS进行ACL重建的结果。仅包括最少随访5年的研究。结果数据包括失败和并发症,手动和仪器检查的松弛,患者报告的结果以及骨关节炎的影像学风险。结果:对总共953名患者的12项研究符合纳入标准。在这些研究中,有8项为1级证据,有2项为2级证据。平均随访时间为8.96年(范围为5-15.3年)。在任何研究中均未观察到移植失败或手动或器械松弛的差异。在1项和2项研究中,分别在BPTB患者中观察到较低的临床结局评分和较大的运动损失。 4项关于膝前疼痛的研究中有2项,记录膝部疼痛的7项研究中有3项在BPTB患者中更常见。一项研究发现HS患者的再手术率显着提高,而另一项研究发现BPTB的结果相似,另一项研究报告了BPTB患者的对侧ACL撕裂明显增加。在5项报道了骨关节炎影像学证据的研究中,有3项指出BPTB患者的发病率显着增加。结论:本系统比较了ACL重建与自体BPTB或自体HS进行ACL重建后的长期结局的比较,结果表明人工/器械松懈和移植失败均无显着差异移植类型之间。使用BPTB移植物后,长期前膝关节疼痛,下跪疼痛和骨关节炎发生率增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号